<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content"> Originally posted by PhilD:
The inference was that all the parts (ie: 100% of them) were made by GM, which is not the case. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
At least "my inference" was and still is that 100% of the H2's content is GM purchased/procured material...pure & simple. GM not only outsourced many component parts, but the "assembly" of their H2 as well...pure and simple.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content"> The biased slant is quite clear. It would be like saying the H1 is assembled from a hotch potch collection of GM & Ford parts with some parts from AMG
</div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Well let's not kid ourselves about the H1 either. It IS a "hotch potch collection" as you put it, of commercially available components with some uniquely AMG parts thrown in! So where’s the "beef?" ...or as you say; "biased slant?"
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content"> Like it not my friend H2's are made by AMG, doesn't matter who sources the parts
</div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Any whoooo, have it your way. Some will only believe what they want to believe, while some of us that were there from the beginning of the H2 program do know there is a VERY BIG difference between "assembled" by AMG for GM and "made" by AMG for GM.