<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Hummer destroyer:
Again, when you can form a debate without resorting to personal attacks, come see me. untll then Shoo, the big people are talking. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
I'm sorry but I have to jump in here. Who is attacking who here?
HD, you are everywhere personally insulting everyone on here just because you are filled with enragement. Debating with you is like debating with a five y/o about people actually living inside the TV. Pointless and tiresome, especially after the 2 weeks that you have been here. The fact that you want to debate about state law, company policy and labor law is absolutely funny since you don't know the VT statues, his company policy (which I'm sure this situation was not mentioned), and Labor law in which this subject has nothing to do with. Plus, given the entire situation, you would have to factor in judge made law, the employers will to enforce the request and the intent on the employee acting on a request that was made to him. Which it was not, it was hearsay, so it is pointless and tiresome.
You were just being a dickhead, saying "if you don't like it tough" on a thread that had nothing to do with you because you need attention because you are enraged. It is old.
|