You speak in absolutes across the board.
Based on the replies to this thread, it's understood that many don't respect the disciplines of science. Or could it be that they just don't appreciate the message? Here is a link from a U.S. governmental agency outlining the known risks and potential risks to humans exposed to DDT.
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles...tml#bookmark05
I recognize the limitations when testing animals for chemical interactions and how those effects transfer to humans, but it seems that even in light of this, there is more than enough cause for concern about DDT.
And, if DDT is the
only answer, where do you propose we get our resources that may be compromised by the use of this compound?