Quote:
|
Originally Posted by star
This "scientist" S. Fred Singer was once employed by the tobacco industry to debunk the fact that tobacco can harm human health and actually kill us. That science has proven out so he's looking for more corrupt work to keep him busy.
|
No. He
attacked the EPA for its 1993 study about the cancer risks of passive smoking and called it "junk science," which it was. He never said smoking didn't harm human health. You simply just don't know what you're talking about on any one topic.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by star
He now admits to performing climate "research" for big oil. He receives annual grants from Exxon.
|
Show me where. In 1998 and 2000 a non-profit corporation he worked for received grants from ExxonMobile. Is that what you are talking about? Either way, big deal. Are oil companies evil for trying to find out what's really going on. Do you deny the evidence of climate cycles predating any human impact?
Nevermind. I'm not going to engage in yet another long debate about the war, which is not a simple or intuitive issue. You can search my earlier posts if you really care or you can safely assume that I agree with almost all of what this Democrat, with no ties to Bush, says:
http://www.opinionjournal.com/editor...l?id=110010107
Also, these are fairly parallel with what I believe:
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q...DBhMWY2YTZkNTI=
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q...2FmOWZiMjMyMTY=