Sorry I forgot to answer your question....
The fact that anyone claimed anything to be Dada qualifies it as such. Per the dadaists, that I've studied, I believe it is "art and anti-art" and therefore is and is not necessarily qualifiable. Anybody could therefore be a Dadaist. My question concerning Frenzy's image revolved around the other images I've studied by the Dadaists.
Alaska...If it's brown it's down!
Alaska...If it's brown it's down!
portable radio for runners...SONY !!! not Dadaist...
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes
Posting Rules