JUST PLAIN WRONG!

[KenP]

Originally Posted by LR wolf

Want to solve it,
white people need to have more kids, plain and simple
when you guys see minorities move in you run away, and move farther away from the cities, then you only have at most on average two kids, where non-whites have three to five,

of course your being taken over, you gave up the territory, and your not replacing the population, not to mention your genes are recessive, so when you have kids with someone who is not white, they loose your characteristics,

sorry, you guys just arent made to exist much longer
Welcome to the new face of Amewrica

Let's see where to start, ok, at the beginning.

Of course we ran from the inner cities. Who the hell would want to live around pimps, thugs, and crack whores having kids just so they can support their drug habits and get a welfare check.. or two or five..?

So sure we gave up the inner cities, but if you look at most of the progressive large cities, you'll see a rebirth. Why? Because these cities see how they are failing because the current population is unable to support the city. They're uneducated, earn no money and only take from the system. They're parasites that drain the life out of the cities. The only way to come back to life for these metro areas is to drive out the poverty stricken and redevelop by pushing the low lifes of all three races to the margins. It's been done for years and it will continue for years.

You also mention recessive genes. I'm sure all the african decendant males are thinking just that when they're hooking up with some fat nasty ass white chick that no white guy would have.

"Amewrica" Is that eubonics?

[LR wolf]

Originally Posted by KenP

Let's see where to start, ok, at the beginning.

Of course we ran from the inner cities. Who the hell would want to live around pimps, thugs, and crack whores having kids just so they can support their drug habits and get a welfare check.. or two or five..?

So sure we gave up the inner cities, but if you look at most of the progressive large cities, you'll see a rebirth. Why? Because these cities see how they are failing because the current population is unable to support the city. They're uneducated, earn no money and only take from the system. They're parasites that drain the life out of the cities. The only way to come back to life for these metro areas is to drive out the poverty stricken and redevelop by pushing the low lifes of all three races to the margins. It's been done for years and it will continue for years.

You also mention recessive genes. I'm sure all the african decendant males are thinking just that when they're hooking up with some fat nasty ass white chick that no white guy would have.

"Amewrica" Is that eubonics?

Hey Ducky, i'm black with Scottish, and Jamaican heratige

the argument above makes no sense at all, other then a bit of name calling you didnt refute anything i said

[RubHer Yellow Ducky]

Originally Posted by LR wolf

Hey Ducky, i'm black with Scottish, and Jamaican heratige

the argument above makes no sense at all, other then a bit of name calling you didnt refute anything i said

Hey Mon, me and Bobby M took a couple of hits together one time...

Scotch Jamaican, that sound cool !

I don't really think the "WHITE" gene is recessive but I'll do some checking and get back to you in a week or 2, after I talk to a Genetics Professor I know...

The term "White Flight" is a possible reasonbut i'm sure there are others...

By the way as we get futher into this discussion, PLEASE don't (and i know you haven't) rely on the minority word.

Being a HEBREW I think I lay a better claim to the minority word then 99% of the worlds population of people who can read and write...The new found tribe in Brazil don't have a written language yet...

more to follow...

[LR wolf]

Originally Posted by RubHer Yellow Ducky

Hey Mon, me and Bobby M took a couple of hits together one time...

Scotch Jamaican, that sound cool !

I don't really think the "WHITE" gene is recessive but I'll do some checking and get back to you in a week or 2, after I talk to a Genetics Professor I know...

The term "White Flight" is a possible reasonbut i'm sure there are others...

By the way as we get futher into this discussion, PLEASE don't (and i know you haven't) rely on the minority word.

Being a HEBREW I think I lay a better claim to the minority word then 99% of the worlds population of people who can read and write...The new found tribe in Brazil don't have a written language yet...

more to follow...

Well said,
not sure who Bobby M is, but i'll half a Haggis with you any day

[RubHer Yellow Ducky]

Originally Posted by LR wolf

Well said,
not sure who Bobby M is "BOB MARLEY" is, but i'll half a Haggis with you any day

Haggis is a traditional Scottish dish.
There are many recipes, most of which have in common the following ingredients:sheep's 'pluck' (heart, liver and lungs), minced with onion, oatmeal,suet, spices, and salt, mixed with stock, and traditionally boiled in the animal's stomach for approximately three hours.
Haggis somewhat resembles stuffed intestines (pig intestines otherwise known as chitterlings or the kokoretsi of traditional Greek cuisine), sausages and savoury puddings of which it is among the largest types. As the 2001 English edition of the Larousse Gastronomique puts it, "Although its description is not immediately appealing, haggis has an excellent nutty texture and delicious savoury flavour." (p592)
Most modern commercial haggis is prepared in a casing rather than an actual stomach. There are also meat-free recipes for vegetarians.
It is often asserted (e.g., on the packaging of MacSween's haggis) that the dish is traditionally served with "neeps and tatties" (Scots: swede, yellow turnip or rutabaga and potatoes; these are boiled and mashed separately) and a "dram" (ie. a glass of Scotch whisky). However, it might perhaps be more accurate to describe this as the traditional main course of a Burns supper, since on other occasions haggis may be eaten with other accompaniments. Whisky sauce (made from thickened stock and Scotch whisky) has recently been developed as an elegant addition.

NO MY FRIEND, I'll let you share it with Dirty or Dennis...

Altho

I might share the Vegetarian version with you...

[KenP]

Originally Posted by LR wolf

Hey Ducky, i'm black with Scottish, and Jamaican heratige

the argument above makes no sense at all, other then a bit of name calling you didnt refute anything i said

I didn't try to refute anything you said, I just pointed out why it's so.

[RubHer Yellow Ducky]

Originally Posted by LR wolf

Want to solve it,
white people need to have more kids, plain and simple
when you guys see minorities move in you run away, and move farther away from the cities, then you only have at most on average two kids, where non-whites have three to five,

of course your being taken over, you gave up the territory, and your not replacing the population, not to mention your genes are recessive, so when you have kids with someone who is not white, they loose your characteristics,

sorry, you guys just arent made to exist much longer
Welcome to the new face of Amewrica

HEY LR, thought you might like this...

A "Black" Man, A Moor, John Hanson

Was the First President of the United States! 1781-1782 A.D.???
George Washington was really the 8th President of the United States!

George Washington was not the first President of the United States. In fact, the first President of the United States was one John Hanson. Don't go checking the encyclopedia for this guy's name - he is one of those great men that are lost to history. If you're extremely lucky, you may actually find a brief mention of his name.

The new country was actually formed on March 1, 1781 with the adoption of The Articles of Confederation.
This document was actually proposed on June 11, 1776, but not agreed upon by Congress until November 15, 1777. Maryland refused to sign this document until Virginia and New York ceded their western lands (Maryland was afraid that these states would gain too much power in the new government from such large amounts of land).

Once the signing took place in 1781, a President was needed to run the country. John Hanson was chosen unanimously by Congress (which included George Washington). In fact, all the other potential candidates refused to run against him, as he was a major player in the revolution and an extremely influential member of Congress.

As the first President, Hanson had quite the shoes to fill. No one had ever been President and the role was poorly defined. His actions in office would set precedent for all future Presidents.

He took office just as the Revolutionary War ended. Almost immediately, the troops demanded to be paid. As would be expected after any long war, there were no funds to meet the salaries. As a result, the soldiers threatened to overthrow the new government and put Washington on the throne as a monarch.

All the members of Congress ran for their lives, leaving Hanson as the only guy left running the government. He somehow managed to calm the troops down and hold the country together. If he had failed, the government would have fallen almost immediately and everyone would have been bowing to King Washington. In fact, Hanson sent 800 pounds of sterling siliver by his brother Samuel Hanson to George Washington to provide the troops with shoes.

Hanson, as President, ordered all foreign troops off American soil, as well as the removal of all foreign flags. This was quite the feat, considering the fact that so many European countries had a stake in the United States since the days following Columbus.

Hanson established the Great Seal of the United States, which all Presidents have since been required to use on all official documents.

President Hanson also established the first Treasury Department, the first Secretary of War, and the first Foreign Affairs Department.

Lastly, he declared that the fourth Thursday of every November was to be Thanksgiving Day, which is still true today.

The Articles of Confederation only allowed a President to serve a one year term during any three year period, so Hanson actually accomplished quite a bit in such little time.

Six other presidents were elected after him - Elias Boudinot (1783), Thomas Mifflin (1784), Richard Henry Lee (1785), Nathan Gorman (1786), Arthur St. Clair (1787), and Cyrus Griffin (1788) - all prior to Washington taking office.

So what happened?

Why don't we ever hear about the first seven Presidents of the United States?

It's quite simple - The Articles of Confederation didn't work well. The individual states had too much power and nothing could be agreed upon.

A new doctrine needed to be written - something we know as the Constitution.

And that leads us to the end of our story.

George Washington was definitely not the first President of the United States. He was the first President of the United States under the Constitution we follow today.

And the first seven Presidents are forgotten in history.

[RubHer Yellow Ducky]

P: Negroid genes aren't "recessive" but "dominant", and that results in the very opposite of what you're saying. When the negro mates with caucasoid or mongoloid the child comes out resembling the negro, because the negro genes are dominant. The "older" genes (as you state) of the negro cause the disappearance of the caucasoid and mongoloid. Isn't this one of the key driving forces for white supremacy and the preservation of their race?
>This proves that the pure Negroid genes:
-skin "black as night"
-hair that will "break" and fall off at a certain length
-extra thick and big lips to absorb humidity in the air
-flat but wide nose to help move air to the lungs to "cool down" the body
P: This is a stereotype.
>this proves that these pure "Negroid" genes to be, occuring later and after the other Racial type genes, as an improvement to better adapt to the changing climate of Africa...as it started to heat up after the last Glacial Ice Age.
P: Hold on, Africans stayed in Africa from their origin until roughly 80,000 B.C....isn't that correct? That's what you have said previously, that migrations from African began 80K B.C. and that's what science says. There weren't "other people" else where on the planet prior to this...correct? The last glacial epoch started in 70,000 B.C. and ended around 10,000 B.C....correct? It was those who had left between 80K and 70K that became trapped behind the glaciers...correct? There was no "adaptation to changing climate in Africa", Africa was, is and always will be hot, until this world ends. You're sticking to a false premise regarding African climate.
>If the pure Negroid genes, as described earlier, were indeed the original Physical traits of the first "Anatomically modern" humans. than wouldn't it stand to reason, that the mixture of the Negroid gene with any other type of racial genes, forever erase that original Negroid genes?...As a reflective proof to the Laws of Natural selection?
P: HELL NO! In fact the opposite has been the case. Again, the Negro gene is "dominant" and erases characteristics in other races...this is a fact and the reality. Maybe I don't understand what you mean here...provide me an example of how Negroid genes are erased when a negro and any other race mix? I mean I see where a white and black mix, the child is no longer white...we call them "mulattos" correct? But, I haven't seen a pure white child (blue eyed and blond) come from a true negro and white mating.
>If the Negroid gene is indeed the oldest...than the mixing of such Negroid racial features with, for example, the Caucasoid gene...should result in a dominate "white" offspring?...Since, according Afro-centrist ideology...Negroids genes came first...
P: Again you've got this completely backwards. Negro is the original human, people of color, absent of all "recessive" traits. White's picked up "recessive" traits from being in "colder" climates. Therefore, when they mix back with the negro, who possesses the original and dominant traits, the "mulatto" is produced...melanin begins to produce color again. Do you understand this?
>the stronger the genes...the newer and later these racial genes should be...to aid in adaptation...of later occuring and changing enviroments...
P: You're wrong. The Negro gene had all the adaptability it needed to deal with the various climates. But, when mutations occur, as from prolonged exposure to a particular climate (like cold, for instance), "natural selection" takes away from the original gene quality in favor of traits needed for survival in the current environment. Problem is, once that happens, it's hard to get back to the original state.
>The history and order of the climaic changes of this planet is...reflected on it's many different faces...of the many different racial types...
P: This is true, the colder it gets the lighter people get. Man originated in the heat and much later moved to the cold, and then came whites and other races...correct?
>These people are the living proof that Caucasian genes are the most recessive...and therefore the oldest.
P: You got half of it right, caucasian genes are the most recessive, but science contradicts you on the idea that this implies they are the oldest. Where do you get this from?
>Negroid genes the strongest...and therefore the newest and latest human, physical evolutionary changes of improvements...
P: Again, where are you getting this from? Negroid genes? There are no "negroid" genes...that's a racist remark. Everyone has the same genes. Being able to darken in light and get lighter in the dark/cold, is the normal behavior of genes. This is the "oldest" gene. But, the problem is that once those genes go through great and extreme change (i.e. melanin production is totally suppressed) it's difficult, nearly impossible to get it to produce color again. You sit in the sun and you tan/burn...but alas, it peels off. This is the melanin cell's attempt at normal functioning.
>FOR THE NEGROID GENE TO BE THE OLDEST...THESE PEOPLE NEED TO BE UNMISTAKENLY WHITE...OR ASIAN...ARE THEY?:
-Tiger Woods: father black, mother asian
-Colln Powell: Scottish and negroid
-Maria Carey: father black, mother white
-Lenny Kravitz: father jewish, mother black
P: No, they follow the scientific method advanced by Mendel's Law. Tiger is darker than his Asian mother. Colin is darker than his Scottish parent, Maria is darker than her white mother, Lenny is darker than his jewish father. The melanian producing cell apparent in black people is a genetically dominant trait and a normal functioning of that cell/genes. Do you understand what "recessive" and "dominant" mean in regard to genetic science...here's the definition:
genetic dominant
adj.
Of, relating to, or characteristic of a pattern of inheritance of an autosomal trait that is expressed by a gene that ALWAYS manifests itself phenotypically
(In other words, the genetic dominant trait will always manifest itself in mating)
Note that you can't search and find "genetic recessive" on goggle, it takes you to "mutations" and "disorders". Recessive genes are not normal...and as such could never be the original condition of man. Now, I'm inclined to allow you your conceptions, considering you're speaking from your own experience. To you, since you are recessive, you're inclined to think that must be "normal" and the way things have always been. But, this is part of the delusion that characterizes the Racist mind. For you own salvation, and that of your offspring, it is important that you know the truth and make decisions that would lead to your successful existance, among normal people, for ever. As long as you make yourself the center of reality, it's no better than a mule trying to say the same...it's a short lived existence.

[RubHer Yellow Ducky]

http://stewartsynopsis.com/chapter_7.htm