 |
|

11-04-2003, 05:16 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 225
|
|
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>if there were any change for '04 you can bet your ass that GM would have advertised that up one side and down the other, since mpg is the greatest weakness than the public can come up with for the H2.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
No, GM can't advertise that. The fuel economy figures are not posted on window stickers, because only the EPA can rate for MPG, and the EPA will not test the H2. So any improvement in MPG has to be determined by the owner. It's just that GM can't say anything positive or negative on MPG since the EPA doesn't test.
I have heard that the Vortec family of engines did receive some airflow modifications to their basic structure, and the engine in the H2 is a Vortec. Not a full generational change in engine technology, but at least an "improvement" I doubt that it's a programming change in the main computor or TCM, but it could be worth looking into your TCM chip for improving performance.
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!!
__________________
Skull & Bones Member since 2003 - H1 Forum Troll since 2004
|

10-26-2003, 09:50 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Woodbury, MN
Posts: 385
|
|
Lucky SOBs  I have never seen 11 mpg. I have been getting about 10 before and after headers and Corsa. By the way I have a 2003.
|

11-04-2003, 01:22 AM
|
 |
Hummer Expert
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 884
|
|
I did expect people to think I was exaggerating. I'm waiting for other '04 owners to chime in.
__________________
H2 '04 Black
|

10-21-2003, 12:37 AM
|
 |
Hummer Expert
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: North Texas
Posts: 523
|
|
What is this about the 2004 being tuned (or improved programming) for better mpg and torque??? Is this true?? Let's hear some authoritative input.
Jim
Red H2
__________________
Jim
2003 H2 Metallic Red (now gone)
2008 H3 Graphite Lux
|

11-04-2003, 05:03 PM
|
Hummer Professional
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: N.CENTRAL OHIO
Posts: 474
|
|
I just got to drive the wife's 04, w/ 400 miles it seems more responsive than the 03 w/7000 miles.
The wife also made the comment on the way home after trading that she thought it ran better.
The 04 is showing 11.6 mpg and the 03 took months to get to 11.4 mpg.
Yell'r 04 Lux w/ air, sunroof,F&R brush bars
Traded 03 White Lux
03 GMC D/A CC SLT LB soon to be 04
__________________
07 White H3 Adventure w/ some black stuff
04.5 GMC D/A CC SLT LB EFI LIVE tuned
98 ZR-2 Blazer
Ex H2&3 owner
My hiking boots and canoe paddle have more miles than most 'offroad' vehicles, over 350 in last year.
|

11-05-2003, 04:34 PM
|
Hummer Professional
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Export, PA
Posts: 295
|
|
3500 miles on mine and its dead on 11.1 and that is mostly back roads with lots of hills. Also quite a bit of start and stops. My Silverado averaged about 13-14 on the same roads. The Escalade is 13.6.
03 Sunset H2!
89 Vette
02 Escalade
|

11-05-2003, 01:55 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 11
|
|
My average is showing 11.1 mpg. My mileage improved on my '04 with the headers, exhaust and cold air intake. I have yet to install my Xtremeflow software upgrade. Hopefully I will get up to 12 mpg.
04 H2 Engine upgrades by Rod Hall Racing
02 BMW M3 Convertible
95 Ferrari F355
01 Ducati 748
__________________
04 H2 Engine upgrades by Rod Hall Racing
02 BMW M3 Convertible
95 Ferrari F355
01 Ducati 748
|

10-20-2003, 09:14 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: LAUREL, MS, USA
Posts: 102
|
|
Do you feel a good difference or bad?
.
"Follow the white rabbit..." Morpheus 1999
__________________
\"Follow the white rabbit...\" Morpheus 1999....... It is finished.
|

10-20-2003, 12:25 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 440
|
|
I read on the internet ( so it must be true), that they made some adjutments to the computer programing..This may account for the powerband shifts you are noticing...
I am waiting on my Hypertech III, whichis suppose to be in route.. With any luck it will give me a small boost.. I've gone the supercharger route on another GM product. Don't bellieve I will do it again..
Mike
|

10-21-2003, 10:12 AM
|
 |
Hummer Expert
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 631
|
|
Would it be too much to ask GM to give the update to dealers so our "old" engines could be tweaked?
HA!!! Dan is probably right on...if not, he is at least "funny"!
Man, I didn't see 11.4 until I hit the 5,000 mile mark.
Ric
OMAHOG/IHOG
Hum2@cox.net
|

10-21-2003, 08:10 PM
|
 |
Hummer Expert
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: North Texas
Posts: 523
|
|
I was getting about 12.2 avg in Dallas area. Now temporarily located in St. Louis area I am getting about 11.6 avg. (more hills). None of this could really be considered "highway" driving. I am at 12000+ miles and never noticed a measurable improvement after 5000 miles as some have reported.
Jim
Red H2
__________________
Jim
2003 H2 Metallic Red (now gone)
2008 H3 Graphite Lux
|

10-20-2003, 11:44 AM
|
 |
Hummer Expert
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 884
|
|
Good difference. It seems like there is more torque up hills and better acceleration from standing position. I don't know if this is just in my mind.
__________________
H2 '04 Black
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:08 AM.
|