Questions about the H2

[churchmore]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content"> He said my truck was badass!!!! I like this guy...be nice to him guys!!! </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Well I do like your H2!

Here is where my current college "frugal" nature comes in. Now being I still am paying college and that, if I too an H2 that I personally owned I would almost be afraid to hurt it haha...then again when I bought the jeep I was too and after the first rocker panel smash I didnt mind too much

Again from what I have read at some of the more jeep techincal sites like NAXJA and pirate4x4 (when i wasnt getting attacked) was IFS initially offers more ground clearance at first, but under any certain flex the differential pumpkin actually will lower negating that clearance. Thats why a lot of IFS Toyotas swap to an SFA. Oh and this whole weak tierod thing, I think the only real proof I have seen is that one video of it snapping. I have seen tons of TJ, XJ tierods bent in pictures.

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content"> Solid Axles offer better articulation, but they have to have it. IFS/IRS offers the opportunity for individual wheel angles that can have all 4 tires running on the tire's tread in situations where a solid axle vehicle would have a tire or 2 running on the sidewall & be attempting to roll the bead off the wheel. Both ways can be excellent. </div></BLOCKQUOTE> And articulation just looks cooler!!

I will admit (dont send this to a jeep site I will tar a feathered) I do like the look of an H2 minus the bling. I saw a VERY nice H2 when I went to go play at Fox Hollow golf course. Black, roof rack, black wheels, brushguard, Trxus ATs. Then there is me...pulling to a golf course missing muffler due to a very bad spotted line at chinamans and a squeaky stock trackbar which will be replaced!

Thanks for the warm welcome!!