Hummer Forums by Elcova  
Forums - Home
Source Decals

Source Motors
Custom. Accessories.

H2 Accessories
H3 Accessories
Other Vehicles

H2 Source

H2 Member Photos
H2 Owners Map
H2 Classifieds
H2 Photo Gallery
SUT Photo Gallery
H2 Details

H2 Club

Chapters
Application

H3 Source

H3 Member Photos
H3 Classifieds
H3 Photo Gallery
H3 Owners Map
H3 Details
H3T Concept

H1 Source

H1 Member Photos
H1 Classifieds
H1 Photo Gallery
H1 Details

General Info

Hummer Dealers
Contact
Advertise

Sponsored Ads
















 


Source Motors - custom. accessories.


Go Back   Hummer Forums by Elcova > Hummer H3 Discussion Forums > General H3 Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-27-2005, 07:01 PM
f5fstop's Avatar
f5fstop f5fstop is offline
Hummer Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Idaho
Posts: 4,744
f5fstop is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by DWPC:
Frankly, I'd rather have the I5 than that 5.7 (350) cast iron dinosaur. My father's Olds had that engine. GM really needs to take those 50-yr old push-rods out back and put 'em out of their misery. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

The Hummer H3 will NOT have the 5.7L V8.

As for pushrod engines, yes, they are antiquated and cannot achieve much performance. I mean, just look at the LS2/LS7, only 400/505 HP (400 lb-ft/470 lb-ft torque) from those antiquated pushrod engines; damn, GM should be ashamed. (Cast iron is going out in many engines, but durability wise, it is still one of the best materials.)


Getting serious, pushrod engines tend to develop more low end torque, than overhead cam engines, in addition, if you have a very low profile front end (Corvette), pushrod is the way to go. OHC engines are lighter, create more RPM. OHV engines tend to float valves at a lower rpm due to valvetrain inertia, but that has not been a problem...let's not forget Penske winning the 500 with a pushrod engine, and the rest of the field was OHC engines.

OHC in an in-line engine tends to be less expensive, while in a V-block it tends to be a lot more expensive. In addition, displacement on demand is more expensive on OHC engines than on OHV engines. On OHV engines all you have to do is bleed oil pressure from the lifters using a simple solenoid controlled by the PCM. Displacement on demand on OHC engines requires more parts, thus more cost, which we know is pushed off on the customer.

This might be a bad comparison, but let's look at some figures:
GM pushrod engines:
4.8L-2V = 300 HP
6.0L-2V = 325 or 390 hp
Ford OHC engines:
5.4L-3V = 300 hp
6.8L-2V = 310 hp
6.9L-3V = 355 hp
There are applications for both, OHC and OHV engines. But to say OHV is antiquated, is funny. Especially since mass produced overhead cam engines have been around since 1912 (Fiat) and mass produced overhead valve engines were first produced in 1917 (Chevrolet).

The 5.3L mentioned in the article is rated about 335 lb-ft or torque at or around 4000 rpm, with 295 hp. It is a two-valve, pushrod engine. (Corrected to pushrod, I was thinking about another 5.3L engine.
There are currently two versions of the 5.3L the LM7 (truck) and the LS4 (car).

And yes, the 5.7L cast-iron dinosaur is gone.
__________________
Black Sheep Hummer Squadron
(ME TOO)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.