![]() |
Re: Why the FJ Cruiser is no Threat to the H3
Someone would know more about what those pictures mean than me. I've never been there.
I would say, an H3 would do it better!
it means that stock, that FJ just completed what your H2 will complete, stock...........
Re: Why the FJ Cruiser is no Threat to the H3
COUGH BULLSH!T COUGH!
Re: Why the FJ Cruiser is no Threat to the H3
dude come on................you are so ****ing clueless if you think the FJ cruiser isn't a capable off-road vehicle. Toyota knows their ****.....Now the H2 and H3 and H1 are all also very capable and I'm sure the H2 would destroy the FJ offroad. But an H3 would be very easily matched.....
Re: Why the FJ Cruiser is no Threat to the H3
Don't get suckered in guys, the two FJ's pictured above are owned by Toyota, being driven by professional drivers employeed by Toyota and are more or less just advertising.
DTHVLY did you ever confirm or deny your employment selling FJ's?
S
P.S Neither pictured is stock, they both have aftermarket bumpers, aftermarket (and larger than available stock) tires, and I'm guessing both have done the switch to bypass the stock acutrac system.
and your going to tell me that "most" of the H2's that we see in your "videos" dont have bigger tires then stock, aftermarket bumpers, racks, yada yada yada?? Those look pretty darn stock to me, **** they have BFG All Terrains........ And who cares what the driver skill level is or who owns the damn vehicle, they completed it..............
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes
Posting Rules