Attn:Republicans

[KenP]

The ruling will be over-turned.

Thank gawd for our country.

I'll give up some freedom because I have nothing to hide.

[f5fstop]

Anna Katherine Johnston Diggs Taylor (yes, that is her entire name ), is well noted to be a liberal POS, and I was not surprised at her ruling. I would have been surprised if she had ruled in favor of the wiretaps.

Her ruling is ludicrous and will probably be over ruled by the 6th District.
Her ruling allowing the plaintiffs standing to challenge the warrantless NSA surveillance program, violates the ruling of SCOTUS. The Plaintiffs in the suit held that they had a "well founded belief" that they had been subjected to warrantless surveillance, yet not one of the plaintiffs alleged that they had actually been surveilled under the NSA program.
SCOTUS has ruled in to establish standing, the plaintiffs must allege an injury that is concrete and particularized, not hypothetical and conjectural.

Her statement, "?There are no hereditary Kings in America and no powers not created by the Constitution. So all ?inherent powers? must derive from that Constitution,? is a clear dig (no pun intended) at GW.

With all the publicity lately over throw-away cell phones, how do the Feds get court orders to listen in on someone's phone calls if they have a hundred different phones and numbers to make the calls. So, I see the monitoring of these calls by NSA a necessity in this day-and-age.

RANT OVER....