Controlled demolition of the World Trade Center's Twin Towers???

[h2co-pilot]

Not to mention not only was it really freaking metal melting hot but the planes took out some very imortant supporting beams and ruined the whole fire preventative plan of the building allowing flames to reach substances that were originally meant to be protected from flames.

We were only so lucky that the building fell that way because the structure was built so well, it could have been a lot worse.

[DennisAJC]

It was definitely hit by planes flown by Saudi Arabians. A country were the Bush family had the most ties financially.

The 1st tower came down with amazing accuracy which I found unusual. And then the second tower came down perfectly. What were the chances that would happen? Talk about luck.

Then Tower 7 came down perfectly also!?!?!?!? That building wasn't even struck. A few unexplained fires brought down a steel structure perfectly into it's footprint???? Mind you Tower 7 took alot of secrets with it because it housed CIA and goverment secrets and skeletons. 90% of the Enron investigation disappeared forever.

This one I really found interesting. A forced blackout the weekend before 9/11 so that the security company can retrofit the building in the dark using flashlights only? All video surveillence was down that weekend. The security company was owned by the Bush family ran by one of the brothers.

Never in the history of the modern world have steel buildings collapsed in that manner unless it was a controlled demolishion.

OK maybe there was a chance it could happen and that science could be wrong. But the chances of 3 at the same time? To revenue losing buildings because they were technologically obslete?

The heavy drilling and jackhammering prior to 9/11 on the deserted floors of both towers which were coincidentally the floors startegically needed to bring them down controlled?

Multiple explosions reported by the firemen in the basement floors??????????

The footage also shows explosions ahead of the collapse almost identical to watching a controlled demolishion.

These were just a few observations I made when I watched it.

It's just freekin creepy!!!!!!! That's all I'm trying to say. Not trying to stir the pot here.


......You know I love you guys.

[h2co-pilot]

Justifying the murder of thousands of Americans to help ExxonMobil would require U.S. officials to engage in a different kind of detachment and an even more profound break with decency and moral norms.

Nevermind the fact that American interests, embassies, ships etc. have been under attack by these people for years before this tragic event and it took a real hero to come in and finally fight it.. (All my heroes have been cowboys.)

Would George W. Bush take the chance of being branded the most evil president of all time by countenancing such wrongdoing? Oil may be in his blood, but would he place the oil industry's interests ahead of his own? (He sure said sayonara to Kenneth Lay and Enron pretty darn fast.) And Bush and everyone else in government know that plans leak. Disinformation specialists at the Pentagon could not keep their office off the front page of The New York Times. In the aftermath of September 11, there has been much handwringing over the supposed fact that U.S. intelligence has been too risk-averse. But, thankfully, some inhibitions - P.R. concerns, career concerns - do provide brakes on the spy-crowd.

You know, fuk it. When terrorism reaches your piddly azz country- I'll bring up the same disrespectful conversation and sit back and make you spout the truth over and over okay?

[GeorgeSSSS]

Let's ask Alec Baldwin.
He can be trusted.



George SSSS

[DennisAJC]

Originally Posted by GeorgeSSSS

Let's ask Alec Baldwin.
He can be trusted.



George SSSS

Yeeesh,

Let's ask Arec Bawrin.....

[CO Hummer]

I watched the first 23 hours of that video, but couldn't finish.

If I would have done the welding on those towers, they wouldn't have collapsed.

[Wisha Haddan H3]

I could maybe go as far as believing in a cover up of what the administration knew about bin laden before the 9/11 attacks. But as much as I dislike President Bush, I would never believe he authorized, approved or orchestrated the actual hijacking or attacks. Nor anyone in our government. No way.

As Paragon said, you don't have to actually melt structural steel for the building to come down. It just has to deform.

And it's no great coincidence that the buildings collapsed vertically instead of falling sideways. During an intentional demolition, you place charges on all the major structural points and set them off simultaneously. If all the supports go at the same time, the building will fall vertically (or collapse inward).

With the twin towers, the planes struck each building, physically stripping away fireproofing and saturating several floors with jetfuel simultaneously. As they burned, all of the supports were heated evenly over the same time span. It's no wonder they failed at the same time and that therefore each building collapsed vertically.

In addition, all the buildings at the WTC (not just the twin towers) were designed to collapse vertically if they ever fell instead of into nearby buildings. They had to withstand lateral, torsional and compression forces (from wind or earthquake) by redirecting them to the center and downward. The buildings did what they were supposed to, not because of conspiracy or demolition, but because of architecture and engineering.