OK, now that's just mean Rush!

[KenP]

Originally Posted by PARAGON

Nevermind, as with everything, conspiracies make it all more palatable.

The Bush administration is supplying Iran and Korea with plutonium. It's true!!! I read it on the inturdweb.

[PARAGON]

Originally Posted by KenP

The Bush administration is supplying Iran and Korea with plutonium. It's true!!! I read it on the inturdweb.

and Jeff Gordon is hetero

[wpage]

Good money in drugs ask Rush!!

[Wisha Haddan H3]

You know, freedom of speech is a good thing. Rush Limbaugh has the right to say what he wants. He’s free to be an arrogant, hypocritical narcissist and to flaunt his conservative stereotypes and bias behind a mask of patriotism and family values. Thank god I’m free to disagree with him.

So what if Michael J. Fox was on display in the TV spot. He’s famous, he’s sincere, people like him, and his condition could benefit from more research. Would you care if Joe Schmoe had the shakes on camera? So what if he accurately demonstrated the symptoms of Parkinsons disease ... how is that dishonest? Who cares if they filmed him on a bad day when his symptoms were severe ... were they supposed to film him on a good day when all his meds were working?

Quick everybody, look at the democrats. They have an agenda! They use actors and voiceovers in their TV spots! They exaggerate or minimize the facts to suit their politics! They’re so evil!!!!!!! I’m glad we have straight shooters like Rush Limbaugh. He refuses to use sarcasm, exaggeration or sound bytes to make his points and never leaves any fact unexamined in his objective political analysis.

This kind of senseless tirade from Rush only hurts the GOP.

[PARAGON]

Originally Posted by Wisha Haddan H3

You know, freedom of speech is a good thing. Rush Limbaugh has the right to say what he wants. He?s free to be an arrogant, hypocritical narcissist and to flaunt his conservative stereotypes and bias behind a mask of patriotism and family values. Thank god I?m free to disagree with him.

So what if Michael J. Fox was on display in the TV spot. He?s famous, he?s sincere, people like him, and his condition could benefit from more research. Would you care if Joe Schmoe had the shakes on camera? So what if he accurately demonstrated the symptoms of Parkinsons disease ... how is that dishonest? Who cares if they filmed him on a bad day when his symptoms were severe ... were they supposed to film him on a good day when all his meds were working?

"Quick everybody, look at the democrats. They have an agenda! They use actors and voiceovers in their TV spots! They exaggerate or minimize the facts to suit their politics! They?re so evil!!!!!!! I?m glad we have straight shooters like Rush Limbaugh. He refuses to use sarcasm, exaggeration or sound bytes to make his points and never leaves any fact unexamined in his objective political analysis."


This kind of senseless tirade from Rush only hurts the GOP.

So what?

Credibility is what.

[Wisha Haddan H3]

Originally Posted by PARAGON

So what?

Credibility is what.

Exactly. Michael J Fox has credibility. He actually has Parkinsons. He has been suffering from it for years. Some days are better and some are worse, but it will never go away until a cure is developed.

When Rush calls MJF's credibility into question, he only discredits himself, and that's what is harming the GOP. Thank you for helping me make my point.

[PARAGON]

Originally Posted by Wisha Haddan H3

Exactly. Michael J Fox has credibility. He actually has Parkinsons. He has been suffering from it for years. Some days are better and some are worse, but it will never go away until a cure is developed.

When Rush calls MJF's credibility into question, he only discredits himself, and that's what is harming the GOP. Thank you for helping me make my point.

I didn't and that wasn't even a good attempt at misdirection.

You don't have credibility when you are obviously pandering to the TV spot for political reasons. It's pretty simple. He was obviously faking it, no questions. If he didn't take meds "just for show", it's the same as faking. It all lacks credibility. At no other times is he shown to be so uncontrollable, so the Fox argument is moot.

Rush Limbaugh simple spoke what everyone else was thinking.



Anything past the fact that Michael J Fox allowed himself to be puppeted for political purposes is nothing more than fodder.

[PARAGON]

Originally Posted by Wisha Haddan H3

Exactly. Michael J Fox has credibility.

Learn comprehension skills. You asked the question.

He has no credibility. He lost credibility for anyone with the disease because he flopped all over the place in a manner inconsistent with anything else he has been shown to do anytime prior to or since that one political ad.

Ever think that it might have taken more than one take to get it right?

It's ludicrous to assume that it's legit.