Nappy headed hoes!!

[BigPoppa1411]

Iits official, IMUS is gone! He was fired today!

[humvee]

Theres always XM. Jason whitlock was just on MNSBC and called JJ and big al terrorist and that they have a track record of stirring the pot then disappearing. They try to drag everything back to the 40's 50's.
Tucker said that he was very brave for saying that. He also said JJ needs to make a path straight to the Duke men and apologize!

If Imus chooses to come back, he'll be back in some form.
If Anna Nichole was still here this would have been small stuff!!! It's about ratings and $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

[KenP]

Originally Posted by BigPoppa1411

Iits official, IMUS is gone! He was fired today!

Yep, CBS fired him, too.

I think I'll start listening to him if he goes to XM.

[humvee]

X2

[MarineHawk]

Originally Posted by KenP

I think I'll start listening to him if he goes to XM.

I loathe Jackson, Sharpton, (MS)NBC, and CBS; but, I also think Imus is a turd. I would rather drive nails into my forehead than listen to his arrogant liberal B.S.

He's an odd guy, and he sometimes can be entertaining, but he way too often adopts these superficially-popular, but stupid, liberal causes.

He's an arrogant, insecure, liberal prick. See
http://frum.nationalreview.com/post/...jU4YzAzYzlmNTU=

He was always accusing Cheney of "war crimes." What BS.

[humvee]

Imus was just that, entertaining! Some thought so and some didn't. So what! No one held a gun to our heads and made us watch him and as far as DICK Cheney What has Cheney done thats so great?

[MarineHawk]

Originally Posted by humvee

Imus was just that, entertaining! Some thought so and some didn't. So what! No one held a gun to our heads and made us watch him and as far as DICK Cheney What has Cheney done thats so great?

It's not whether one likes Cheney or not, but I truly despise comparisons of modern U.S. politicians (on either side) to Nazis (who killed/tortured tens of millions of people out of racial ideology) or others who have really committed war crimes. People who think that any U.S. leader has committed war crimes knows nothing about the recent or long-term history of warfare. We spend hundreds of billions of dollars on engaging in a war using smart munnitions and unbelievable restraint and subjecting our own troops to significant casualties in order to prevent excess destruction to the people in the lands where we are fighting. We have the power and technology to transform in minutes any part of the Middle East into what Dreden, Hamburg, Tokyo, and Hiroshima looked like in 1945. Arguably, that would not be a war crime. Certainly, what we are doing now is not a war crime.

[humvee]

I don't think Imus thinks in his heart that Cheney is a Nazi any more than what he said about those girls. Remember Imus is ,was, a " Shock Jock". I and others question what Cheney and others are doing. Is right, wrong? I do know. I'm not privy to classifed info. I do care what happens to my kids, Your kids, you or anyone for that matter that risks their life for freedom.
For ANY leader to put someone in harms way for no reason and to cause that person to loose their life to gain nothing is a crime.
Ask anyone who has had their loved ones head sawed off and drug through the streets if that is a crime. That wouldn't have happened if we weren't there.
That is just my opinion and I respect yours as well.

And just think. this thread was about nappy headed hoes

[MarineHawk]

Originally Posted by humvee

I don't think Imus thinks in his heart that Cheney is a Nazi any more than what he said about those girls. Remember Imus is ,was, a " Shock Jock". I and others question what Cheney and others are doing. Is right, wrong? I do know. I'm not privy to classifed info. I do care what happens to my kids, Your kids, you or anyone for that matter that risks their life for freedom.
For ANY leader to put someone in harms way for no reason and to cause that person to loose their life to gain nothing is a crime.
Ask anyone who has had their loved ones head sawed off and drug through the streets if that is a crime. That wouldn't have happened if we weren't there.

Yeah, we didn't invade Afghanistan after the 98 Cole incident and all of the other Al Qaeda acts against us when we knew they were escalating things, which would have involved risking having some military casualties. Then 9/11 happened. Yet, if we had done that, people would never know that 9/11 never happened, because people don't understand deterence, but they would know about the casualties, and they would be calling the military commanders, and perhaps Al Gore, war criminals. It's pretty silly.

If you don't believe Bush/Cheney that we didn't go in "for no reason," listen to what the Democrats were saying BEFORE we went in and things got messy; not the revisionist history now:

Originally Posted by John Kerry

Second, without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime. We all know the litany of his offenses. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. He miscalculated an eight-year war with Iran. He miscalculated the invasion of Kuwait. He miscalculated America's response to that act of naked aggression. He miscalculated the result of setting oil rigs on fire. He miscalculated the impact of sending scuds into Israel and trying to assassinate an American President. He miscalculated his own military strength. He miscalculated the Arab world's response to his misconduct. And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/wmdquotes.asp

[evldave]

Originally Posted by MarineHawk

It's not whether one likes Cheney or not, but I truly despise comparisons of modern U.S. politicians (on either side) to Nazis (who killed/tortured tens of millions of people out of racial ideology) or others who have really committed war crimes. People who think that any U.S. leader has committed war crimes knows nothing about the recent or long-term history of warfare. We spend hundreds of billions of dollars on engaging in a war using smart munnitions and unbelievable restraint and subjecting our own troops to significant casualties in order to prevent excess destruction to the people in the lands where we are fighting. We have the power and technology to transform in minutes any part of the Middle East into what Dreden, Hamburg, Tokyo, and Hiroshima looked like in 1945. Arguably, that would not be a war crime. Certainly, what we are doing now is not a war crime.