Do we need a shaky outfit like Blue Ribbon Coalition?

[KenP]

Originally Posted by GVCOGuy

Maybe so, however, what do you guys recommend people do to help keep the trails open?

You are the forum founders so I assume you are involved and can share.

Alec? Ok, I guess it's good to hear from you.

[KenP]

Originally Posted by GVCOGuy

Thanks Ken, I?m doing good and I hope you and Suzan are keeping well.


So how come you are so interested in Western trail management now? You never used to be but I like the new attitude. Keep it up.

It's important all trails are kept open, or "rotated". However, there are other forces at work out there. There are other more powerful stakeholders out there and its important everyone understands where their cash is going. Where their efforts are really being focused. Where those online petitions are being put forth.

So many things are not what they seem.

Who are the stakeholders? Those are the one's trying to benefit in one way or the other.

Post them up.

[KenP]

Originally Posted by KenP

Who are the stakeholders? Those are the one's trying to benefit in one way or the other.

Post them up.

Originally Posted by AlecW

I agree. Who are they other than CPs links from over a decade ago.

2006 was just a few months ago.

Anyway, I ask you and J to post a new list of the current stakeholders in BRC.

[KenP]

It's late, I'm going to bed and look forward to links to the stakeholders of BRC.Better yet, how about links to more reputable organizations that are actually looking out for the ORV-end-use user.I'll say it again, I believe J's heart is in the right place, but BRC is the wrong place to put the love.If I'm wrong, please show it so we can move on, donate, and contribute.

[KenP]

Originally Posted by GVCOGuy

Like the liberal media you try to distract when you can?t argue a point. What was with the links from the 1990?s and 2000? Jac answered the 2006 issue already.

Where?

Alec, after all this time I was hoping you'd grown out of your schitzoid psycho drunk rants, but I guess you haven't.

Back on point, no one was attacking anyone. J pointed out the BRC as a place to donate to, we brought up counter-productive issues with the BRC. That's called debate and totally warranted when it involves something as important as keeping trails open, and/or opening new ones/closing old ones.

Now if you want to defend a lobbying group that is supported by big business, re: controlled by big business, then go ahead. But when those trails you're defending become unusable by the recreational off roader because business's are now using the trails as roads to move oil, timber and other resources, don't come crying here. The BRC won't be there for you.

The BRC is using new legislation to take over those lands it wants open.

Didn't you read anything?

[LadyRed]

Originally Posted by KenP

Where?


The BRC is using new legislation to take over those lands it wants open.

I will shut my mud hole.

[DennisAJC]

Originally Posted by LadyRed

I'm a sack rider from Hummer X-lax

Sorry,

AEs and BRC lies get automatic Van Bannage.