![]() |
Re: Some closures are O.K.
Post them up.
Anyway, I ask you and J to post a new list of the current stakeholders in BRC.
Re: Some closures are O.K.
Re: Some closures are O.K.
Alec, after all this time I was hoping you'd grown out of your schitzoid psycho drunk rants, but I guess you haven't.
Back on point, no one was attacking anyone. J pointed out the BRC as a place to donate to, we brought up counter-productive issues with the BRC. That's called debate and totally warranted when it involves something as important as keeping trails open, and/or opening new ones/closing old ones.
Now if you want to defend a lobbying group that is supported by big business, re: controlled by big business, then go ahead. But when those trails you're defending become unusable by the recreational off roader because business's are now using the trails as roads to move oil, timber and other resources, don't come crying here. The BRC won't be there for you.
The BRC is using new legislation to take over those lands it wants open.
Didn't you read anything?
Re: Some closures are O.K.
The BRC is using new legislation to take over those lands it wants open.
I will shut my mud hole.
Last edited by DennisAJC : 06-13-2008 at 02:59 PM.
Re: Do we need a shaky outfit like Blue Ribbon Coalition?
Sorry,
AEs and BRC lies get automatic Van Bannage.
My Video Collectionez
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes
Posting Rules